Notices
 

Thread: World's Fastest RC Car Challenge

Page 6 of 28 FirstFirst 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425 ... LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 677
  1.  
    Join Date
    06-14-2000
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    2,064
    I was hoping that the track was small enough to be able to make one complete lap around it to reach the top speed. So radio range and batteries do become an issue IMO. And even if you had signal at that range, don't you get some delay when you are that far out?
     

  2.  
    Join Date
    04-18-2004
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,538
    Quote Originally Posted by REVOman
    lol, i cant help but find humor in this, personally, i dont think any car is gonna go very fast usin the Boat prop
    Even if it did, it would be disqualified
    Remember the rule: "No Thrust powered vehicles"
     

  3.  
    Join Date
    11-24-2002
    Location
    Detroit-yeah,we make cars
    Posts
    1,185
    Quote Originally Posted by Grant Tokumi
    And even if you had signal at that range, don't you get some delay when you are that far out?
    Good point.I'll check mine later today.
     

  4.  
    Join Date
    02-17-2002
    Location
    Newport, Rhode Island, U.S.A
    Posts
    1,443
    Quote Originally Posted by crank throw wei
    Good point.I'll check mine later today.
    The delay is so miniscule you wouldnt notice it.
    -----====Speedtester====-----
     

  5.  
    Join Date
    11-24-2002
    Location
    Detroit-yeah,we make cars
    Posts
    1,185
    What I noticed was in a very open area,the delay was minimal.With objects such as building,trees,etc. around,the delay was pronounced.I tried this with an AM radio,which may have little bearing for our purposes.
     

  6.  
    Join Date
    06-14-2000
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    2,064
    Quote Originally Posted by crank throw wei
    What I noticed was in a very open area,the delay was minimal.With objects such as building,trees,etc. around,the delay was pronounced.I tried this with an AM radio,which may have little bearing for our purposes.
    Good to know. What I remember was when I first got started in rc, I would want to see how far it could go so I'd drive it up my narrow street with houses on both sides. As I got pretty far, maybe 80-100yds, I noticed I had some delay in my controls, so that made it difficult to turn around sometimes. I had an AM as well. So that experience kind of matches what you found today. At least its consistant.
     

  7.  
    Join Date
    02-17-2002
    Location
    Newport, Rhode Island, U.S.A
    Posts
    1,443
    Ok someone please correct me if I'm wrong but dont radio waves travel at around 186,000 miles per sec if not obstructed but anything??
    -----====Speedtester====-----
     

  8.  
    Join Date
    10-08-2002
    Location
    SLC, UT
    Posts
    5,667
    I don't think so. That's the speed of light, I don't think radio waves travel anywhere near that fast. I could be wrong, but I think they're a bit slower, still fast mind you, just not that fast.

    Anyways, I'm thinking that signal strength may have more to do w/ the delay than the distance. Since there were a lot of objects for the signal to bounce off of, that could have weakened the signal a bit by the time it actually got to the vehicle. I'm kinda thinking that maybe Rx's need a certain strength of signal, like a specific threshhold (sp?) or something, before they react to the signal. Maybe it took that long for a strong enough signal to get to the vehicle? Just a guess really, as I don't know exactly how the radios work, but it seems like a possible solution, even if it is completely incorrect.
     

  9.  
    Join Date
    09-30-2002
    Location
    Toulouse
    Posts
    621
    Delay is really minimal, as someone said it, the radio wave travel so fast you'll need highly precise instrument to even detect it.

    Don't forget that the plane guys use the same type radio that we do.

    They go a lot further than we do with plane that can travel at twice the speed of most car ( not to talk about jet powered plane LoL)

    If there was any sort of delay or anything like it, they would not be able to drive their plane.

    So, just don't worry about range and delay, I tell ya, there's better think to think off when you try to break the 100 mph barrier !

    DFF
     

  10.  
    Join Date
    03-20-2002
    Location
    Rockford IL.
    Posts
    359
    The delay is nil almost, insignificant.

    There is far more delay from the eye to the hand.
     

  11.  
    Join Date
    04-07-2000
    Location
    Lake Forest, CA
    Posts
    6,151
    Radio waves travel at the speed of light (186,000 miles per second) , so I would be VERY impressed if you could detect any delay from a 1/4 mile.
     

  12.  
    Join Date
    11-05-2003
    Location
    Mt. Holly, NC
    Posts
    1,835
    Steve Pond
    Do you have any kind of idea how the speed will be measured to verify it and will it have to be backed up with another run in the opposite direction like they do the big cars at the Salt Flats?

    Will it be with a radar gun, measured distance through a trap of say 100 feet or is it going to be what it will run around the entire 1/2 mile track?

    This makes a difference to what kind of car and set up I need to engineer and build.

    This is a great idea you guys decided to do, but can't we do it this year too?
     

  13.  
    Join Date
    12-09-2003
    Location
    my happy place
    Posts
    656
    why would anyone want the track set up so that the radios become an issue? this a high speed challenge, not a radio challenge, right? i'd like to see the track set up to allow as close to daytona superspeedway racing as possible, meaning hammer down and never lift! we can't go run an rc bovveville, so let's let the cars run as flat out as possible.

    i know it's only one class... top speed, but i hope there are some people willing to bring out some non-contenders if only for fun. like was posted earlier, i'd rather see an 80 mph monster truck than a 100 mph touring car. classes would ne nice, if not until "next year"

    please, no prize money.
     

  14.  
    how bout we put a kicker on the track, and go for most air?

    -Nick
     

  15.  
    Join Date
    04-08-2002
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    77
    Steve- This is Jason from TRX. Could you send me a PM with your email addy, I need to ask ya a question about the rules!

    Thanks
     

  16.  
    Join Date
    04-18-2004
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,538
    I would guess that it would be a two way record. That is how the boat is. Otherwise the boat record would be 122.8. Also, that negates wind or track effects on speed. The only thing that matters then is the car. Wish I had a way to get to CA, but it is too far for me .
     

  17.  
    Join Date
    03-20-2002
    Location
    Rockford IL.
    Posts
    359
    Wish I had a way to get to CA, but it is too far for me
    It is too far away from 90% of us, unless you happen to live on the west coast.
     

  18.  
    Join Date
    09-07-2002
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    7,387
    Quote Originally Posted by rc10gtisthebest
    LOL, you and me both. South Florida is like cut off from everything... We always have to travel for something.
    I know what you mean, but we get some cool things, like the air and sea show and some other things...o who am i kidding...we get NO RC STUFF! lol
     

  19.  
    Join Date
    09-07-2002
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    7,387
    Quote Originally Posted by DualBL
    how bout we put a kicker on the track, and go for most air?

    -Nick
    I'm with him^ hehehe....
     

  20.  
    Join Date
    03-31-2002
    Location
    Gateshead, England
    Posts
    1,296
    Quote Originally Posted by ElectricThunder
    I know what you mean, but we get some cool things, like the air and sea show and some other things...o who am i kidding...we get NO RC STUFF! lol
    Methinks you have the 1/10th touring world championships this year - pretty high profile.

    Anyway people, stop fussing about the location of the event - I'm 8 time zones away, 13 hours flight, and I think its a great idea, and a great location. There's no race track in the world that is next door to EVERYBODY.
     

  21.  
    Join Date
    12-09-2003
    Location
    my happy place
    Posts
    656
    people don't want a track that's close to everybody, just one that's close to THEM.
     

  22.  
    Join Date
    06-26-2000
    Location
    Allen, TX
    Posts
    1,852
    The speed trap will be very short, like ten feet, and all we care about is the maximum velocity. Not average speed over a longer distance, not an average of two or more runs.
     

  23.  
    Join Date
    04-18-2004
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,538
    You should do a two way to negate any wind/track/hill/etc. effects so the only thing that matters is the car.
     

  24.  
    Join Date
    03-20-2002
    Location
    Rockford IL.
    Posts
    359
    The speed trap will be very short, like ten feet, and all we care about is the maximum velocity. Not average speed over a longer distance, not an average of two or more runs.
    That will be quite an unreliable way to measure, a ten mile tailwind at track level will mean just that, 10 mph added to the top end.

    You don't think that's a huge variable, Peter? It's not like everyone will have the same tail or head wind, what happens when one guy gets a 20mph tailwind and the wind is down to 5mph through the traps for the next guy?
     

  25.  
    Join Date
    06-14-2000
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    2,064
    I'm no expert in aerodynamics, but something tells me a 10 mph tailwind would not automatically add 10 mph to a car's top speed. Maybe in an airplane, but not in a car.
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •